Skip to content →

Open Journal of Jungian Typology Posts

Why Gal Gadot Might Be INTJ

By John Stevens I disagree with CelebrityTypes’ typing of Gal Gadot as an ESFJ. I think she’s INTJ. I have read her quotes, read her Wiki entry, saw a lot of her interviews. I just want you to take my impression in for consideration. At her W interview, pay attention to her story from 0:35 to 1:41 when she’s describing how she didn’t want to take the beauty pageant contest seriously. It’s Ni-Te. An Fe dom would at least be polite in how they don’t want to take part in the beauty pageant. In her case, she’s very sarcastic and blunt…

Comments closed

Type and Opinion

By Lee Morgan Part One: Wittgenstein; Or, the Platonist Positivists argue that all truths are verifiable through scientific experimentation, or mathematical deduction. The philosophy of positivism is best expressed today among the so-called New Atheists. Writers like Sam Harris[1] argue that the scientific method alone can establish truthfulness. Such hardline reductionism has sparked controversy among academic philosophers like Roger Scruton[2]. Thinkers like Scruton criticize positivism for denying the possibility of the sacred. While Scruton agrees that the sacred is immeasurable, he still asserts its truthfulness. Moreover, he argues that positivism denies what is essential to a meaningful life. That being…

Comments closed

On Hume and Social Justice

By Lee Morgan In recent years, few issues have been as polarizing as that concerning racism. And understandably so. The world has a dark past and our fathers’ trauma has long drawn its traces in eternity. Of course, I have no means of resolving the discussion, nor do I offer much in the way of consolation. What follows is but my attempt to clarify ideas, and should in no way be understood as a repudiation of the feelings associated with them. Part One: Institutional Racism Is institutional racism separable from the liberal conception of government? Assuming first that the two…

Comments closed

Why Cleopatra Might be ESTP

By Hannah Strachan Most people would probably type Cleopatra as ENTJ or ENTP, and quite possibly peg her as having a narcissistic style too. For my part, I disagree with all of that. Let’s look a bit at Cleopatra in her proper historical and cultural context. We are not presented with a wealth of information, but nor are we lost in the dark either. We have testimonies from various sources (both negative Roman sources, and more positive ones from the Middle East), and all of them seem to point to a single type. Our sources agree that she possessed strategic,…

Comments closed

From Object and Subject to Functions

By Boye Akinwande Object – simply a thing. An entity… Subject – Subclass of object. Refers specifically to the the sentient properties of an Object…we as human beings are of importance here… “Object” can make reference to both Subjects and the impersonal/mechanical properties of human beings as well From these, we arrive at: Subject to Object– Subject’s mechanical relationship to Object (Te) **puts self/sentiments in accordance with mechanics of environment Object to Subject – Object’s sentimental relationship to Subject (Fi) **reaches full height of personal feeling Subject to Subject – Subject’s sentimental relationship to Subject (Fe) **gets best grasp on…

Comments closed

The Curse of Elite Stupid

There’s a problem that’s pretty widespread in typology circles, which I call “elite stupid.” Many typologists are smarter than your average person, but still not part of the academic elite. So they read a couple of books about “big topics” and make conclusions based on those few books that miss the bigger picture. For example, typologists who are into Sam Harris will sometimes talk about his “deep erudition”, “unparalleled in his conceptual clarity” and so on. But almost the whole class of academic elites who are specialized in his field find him to be unclear in his reasoning and selective/haphazard in…

Comments closed

The Svetasvatara Upanishad and Typology

By Lee Morgan I recently read Valerie J. Roebuck’s translation of the Upanishads and was struck by her translation of the Svetasvatara Upanishad. Unlike the majority of the Upanishads, the Svetasvatara Upanishad was written in an increasingly theistic culture, and accordingly, it raises an interesting philosophical question, and one not unfamiliar to western theists: if a benevolent God exists, why would He create a world of illusions and people it with souls whose salvation and only real chance of happiness requires that they transcend it? In a roundabout way, it’s the same question Stephen Fry asks Christian’s when he sees…

Comments closed

Plato and Solipsism

By Lee Morgan Plato’s Republic begins with Socrates debating Thrasymachus. Their disagreement regards the essence of justice. Throughout the argument, Socrates presents an idealistic, egalitarian perspective. Though avoiding definitions, he insists that justice serves the whole community. But Thrasymachus disagrees. He asserts that “justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger.” And while Plato favored his mentor’s idealism, both interlocutors present captivating arguments. And indeed the debate even ends in aporia; and for uncertainty at that! From there continue the Republic‘s nine, remaining books. These present the Socratic conception of justice in allegory. But they all presume Thrasymachus…

Comments closed

Nick Cave and the Archetypal INFP

By Lee Morgan Nick Cave: “All outward motion connects to nothing for each is concerned with their immediate need.” (As I Sat Sadly By Her Side) Nick Cave: “God has given you but one heart. You are not a home for the hearts of your brothers.” (As I Sat Sadly By Her Side) Nick Cave: “[Reading Mark’s Gospel] one is reminded of a child recounting some amazing tale… the narrative aches with the melancholy of absence…  the outpourings of [Christ’s] brilliant, jewel-like imagination are… misunderstood, rebuffed, ignored, mocked and vilified… It is Christ’s divine inspiration, versus the dull rationalism of…

Comments closed

INFJ Portrait

By Tiffani Warren INFJs at their best are nuanced and empathetic individuals who use their understanding of relationships and society to craft and realize the futures they envision. They are very perceptive of the implications of people’s words or actions, and are skilled at developing predictions and making judgments quickly based on limited information. That said, they sometimes “miss the trees for the forest” – being so wrapped up in their grand ideas that they forget to take note of what actually exists and is happening in the present. Their primary interest is in collating and refining their understanding of…

Comments closed